token.app › Compare › Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Flint (free)

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Flint (free)

Flint (free) is free to use, against $0.745 per million tokens. Flint (free) accepts the larger context window (262K).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructFlint (free)
ProviderAlibabaRecursive
Input $/1M$0.660Free
Output $/1M$1.00Free
Blended $/1M$0.745Free
Context window33K262K
Max output29K236K
ReleasedNov 2024Oct 2026
LicenceOpen weightsOpen weights
Choose Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Flint (free) if…
  • Costs less per token — Free vs $0.745 blended
  • Larger context window (262K)
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct or Flint (free)?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Flint (free), so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct cheaper than Flint (free)?
Flint (free) is cheaper: Free versus $0.745 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.660 vs Free. Output alone: $1.00 vs Free.
What context windows do Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Flint (free) have?
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: 32,768 tokens. Flint (free): 262,144 tokens.
Who makes Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Flint (free)?
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba. Flint (free) is made by Recursive.
Related comparisons
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct full details Flint (free) full details Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Glimpse Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Mercury 3