token.app › Compare › Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Beam 1.0 501B A23B is 1.9× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Beam 1.0 501B A23B accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen2.5 VL 72B InstructBeam 1.0 501B A23B
ProviderAlibabaReflection
Input $/1M$0.800$0.250
Output $/1M$1.00$1.00
Blended $/1M$0.850$0.438
Context window128K1.0M
Max output115K131K
ReleasedFeb 2025Oct 2026
LicenceOpen weightsOpen weights
Choose Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Beam 1.0 501B A23B if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.438 vs $0.850 blended
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct and Beam 1.0 501B A23B, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct cheaper than Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Beam 1.0 501B A23B is cheaper: $0.438 versus $0.850 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.800 vs $0.250. Output alone: $1.00 vs $1.00.
What context windows do Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct and Beam 1.0 501B A23B have?
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct: 128,000 tokens. Beam 1.0 501B A23B: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct and Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is made by Alibaba. Beam 1.0 501B A23B is made by Reflection.
Related comparisons
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct full details Beam 1.0 501B A23B full details Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct vs Flint (free) Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct vs Glimpse Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct vs Mercury 3