token.app › Compare › Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct vs Mercury 3

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct vs Mercury 3

Mercury 3 is 5.2× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Mercury 3 accepts the larger context window (1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen2.5 VL 72B InstructMercury 3
ProviderAlibabaInception
Input $/1M$0.800$0.100
Output $/1M$1.00$0.350
Blended $/1M$0.850$0.163
Context window128K1M
Max output115K131K
ReleasedFeb 2025Oct 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct if…
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Mercury 3 if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.163 vs $0.850 blended
  • Larger context window (1M)
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct or Mercury 3?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct and Mercury 3, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct cheaper than Mercury 3?
Mercury 3 is cheaper: $0.163 versus $0.850 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.800 vs $0.100. Output alone: $1.00 vs $0.350.
What context windows do Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct and Mercury 3 have?
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct: 128,000 tokens. Mercury 3: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct and Mercury 3?
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is made by Alibaba. Mercury 3 is made by Inception.
Related comparisons
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct full details Mercury 3 full details Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct vs Flint (free) Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct vs Glimpse Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B