token.app › Compare › Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 3.2× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen2.5 VL 72B InstructDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
ProviderAlibabaDeepSeek
Input $/1M$0.800$0.150
Output $/1M$1.00$0.600
Blended $/1M$0.850$0.262
Context window128K1.0M
Max output115K393K
ReleasedFeb 2025Oct 2026
LicenceOpen weightsOpen weights
Choose Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.262 vs $0.850 blended
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is cheaper: $0.262 versus $0.850 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.800 vs $0.150. Output alone: $1.00 vs $0.600.
What context windows do Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 have?
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct: 128,000 tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is made by Alibaba. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is made by DeepSeek.
Related comparisons
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct full details DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 full details Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct vs Flint (free) Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct vs Glimpse Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct vs Mercury 3