token.app › Compare › Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is 1.8× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Gemini 3.7 Flash accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen2.5 VL 72B InstructGemini 3.7 Flash
ProviderAlibabaGoogle
Input $/1M$0.800$0.750
Output $/1M$1.00$3.75
Blended $/1M$0.850$1.50
Context window128K1.0M
Max output115K66K
ReleasedFeb 2025Aug 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.850 vs $1.50 blended
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Gemini 3.7 Flash if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct or Gemini 3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct and Gemini 3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct cheaper than Gemini 3.7 Flash?
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is cheaper: $0.850 versus $1.50 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.800 vs $0.750. Output alone: $1.00 vs $3.75.
What context windows do Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct and Gemini 3.7 Flash have?
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct: 128,000 tokens. Gemini 3.7 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct and Gemini 3.7 Flash?
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is made by Alibaba. Gemini 3.7 Flash is made by Google.
Related comparisons
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct full details Gemini 3.7 Flash full details Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct vs Flint (free) Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct vs Glimpse Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B