token.app › Compare › Qwen3 32B vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

Qwen3 32B vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

Qwen3 32B is 6.5× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3 32BGemini 3.5 Flash Lite
ProviderAlibabaGoogle
Input $/1M$0.080$0.300
Output $/1M$0.280$2.50
Blended $/1M$0.130$0.850
Context window131K1.0M
Max output16K66K
ReleasedApr 2025Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Qwen3 32B if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.130 vs $0.850 blended
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3 32B or Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3 32B and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3 32B cheaper than Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
Qwen3 32B is cheaper: $0.130 versus $0.850 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.080 vs $0.300. Output alone: $0.280 vs $2.50.
What context windows do Qwen3 32B and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite have?
Qwen3 32B: 131,072 tokens. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3 32B and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
Qwen3 32B is made by Alibaba. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is made by Google.
Related comparisons