token.app › Compare › Qwen3 32B vs Inkling
Qwen3 32B vs Inkling
Qwen3 32B is 14× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Inkling accepts the larger context window (524K).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen3 32B | Inkling | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | Thinkingmachines |
| Input $/1M | $0.080 | $1.00 |
| Output $/1M | $0.280 | $4.05 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.130 | $1.76 |
| Context window | 131K | 524K |
| Max output | 16K | 472K |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Open weights |
Choose Qwen3 32B if…
- Costs less per token — $0.130 vs $1.76 blended
Choose Inkling if…
- Larger context window (524K)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3 32B or Inkling?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3 32B and Inkling, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3 32B cheaper than Inkling?
Qwen3 32B is cheaper: $0.130 versus $1.76 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.080 vs $1.00. Output alone: $0.280 vs $4.05.
What context windows do Qwen3 32B and Inkling have?
Qwen3 32B: 131,072 tokens. Inkling: 524,288 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3 32B and Inkling?
Qwen3 32B is made by Alibaba. Inkling is made by Thinkingmachines.