token.app › Compare › Qwen3 Coder Next vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Qwen3 Coder Next vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Qwen3 Coder Next is 1.5× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Beam 1.0 501B A23B accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3 Coder NextBeam 1.0 501B A23B
ProviderAlibabaReflection
Input $/1M$0.120$0.250
Output $/1M$0.800$1.00
Blended $/1M$0.290$0.438
Context window262K1.0M
Max output236K131K
ReleasedFeb 2026Oct 2026
LicenceOpen weightsOpen weights
Choose Qwen3 Coder Next if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.290 vs $0.438 blended
Choose Beam 1.0 501B A23B if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3 Coder Next or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3 Coder Next and Beam 1.0 501B A23B, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3 Coder Next cheaper than Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper: $0.290 versus $0.438 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.120 vs $0.250. Output alone: $0.800 vs $1.00.
What context windows do Qwen3 Coder Next and Beam 1.0 501B A23B have?
Qwen3 Coder Next: 262,144 tokens. Beam 1.0 501B A23B: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3 Coder Next and Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Qwen3 Coder Next is made by Alibaba. Beam 1.0 501B A23B is made by Reflection.
Related comparisons