token.app › Compare › Qwen3 Coder Next vs Mercury 3
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Mercury 3
Mercury 3 is 1.8× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Mercury 3 accepts the larger context window (1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen3 Coder Next | Mercury 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | Inception |
| Input $/1M | $0.120 | $0.100 |
| Output $/1M | $0.800 | $0.350 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.290 | $0.163 |
| Context window | 262K | 1M |
| Max output | 236K | 131K |
| Released | Feb 2026 | Oct 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
Choose Qwen3 Coder Next if…
- Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Mercury 3 if…
- Costs less per token — $0.163 vs $0.290 blended
- Larger context window (1M)
- Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3 Coder Next or Mercury 3?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3 Coder Next and Mercury 3, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3 Coder Next cheaper than Mercury 3?
Mercury 3 is cheaper: $0.163 versus $0.290 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.120 vs $0.100. Output alone: $0.800 vs $0.350.
What context windows do Qwen3 Coder Next and Mercury 3 have?
Qwen3 Coder Next: 262,144 tokens. Mercury 3: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3 Coder Next and Mercury 3?
Qwen3 Coder Next is made by Alibaba. Mercury 3 is made by Inception.
Related comparisons