token.app › Compare › Qwen3 Coder Next vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Qwen3 Coder Next vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 1.1× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen3 Coder Next | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | DeepSeek |
| Input $/1M | $0.120 | $0.150 |
| Output $/1M | $0.800 | $0.600 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.290 | $0.262 |
| Context window | 262K | 1.0M |
| Max output | 236K | 393K |
| Released | Feb 2026 | Oct 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Open weights |
Choose Qwen3 Coder Next if…
- No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 if…
- Costs less per token — $0.262 vs $0.290 blended
- Larger context window (1.0M)
- Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3 Coder Next or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3 Coder Next and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3 Coder Next cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is cheaper: $0.262 versus $0.290 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.120 vs $0.150. Output alone: $0.800 vs $0.600.
What context windows do Qwen3 Coder Next and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 have?
Qwen3 Coder Next: 262,144 tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3 Coder Next and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Qwen3 Coder Next is made by Alibaba. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is made by DeepSeek.
Related comparisons