token.app › Compare › Qwen3 Coder Next vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

Qwen3 Coder Next vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is 2.6× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3 Coder NextDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
ProviderAlibabaDeepSeek
Input $/1M$0.120$0.090
Output $/1M$0.800$0.180
Blended $/1M$0.290$0.113
Context window262K1.0M
Max output262K384K
ReleasedFeb 2026Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsOpen weights
Choose Qwen3 Coder Next if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.113 vs $0.290 blended
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3 Coder Next or DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3 Coder Next and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3 Coder Next cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is cheaper: $0.113 versus $0.290 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.120 vs $0.090. Output alone: $0.800 vs $0.180.
What context windows do Qwen3 Coder Next and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 have?
Qwen3 Coder Next: 262,144 tokens. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3 Coder Next and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?
Qwen3 Coder Next is made by Alibaba. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is made by DeepSeek.
Related comparisons