token.app › Compare › Qwen3 Coder Next vs Gemini 3.6 Flash
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Gemini 3.6 Flash
Qwen3 Coder Next is 10× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Gemini 3.6 Flash accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen3 Coder Next | Gemini 3.6 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | |
| Input $/1M | $0.120 | $1.50 |
| Output $/1M | $0.800 | $7.50 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.290 | $3.00 |
| Context window | 262K | 1.0M |
| Max output | 262K | 66K |
| Released | Feb 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
Choose Qwen3 Coder Next if…
- Costs less per token — $0.290 vs $3.00 blended
- Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Gemini 3.6 Flash if…
- Larger context window (1.0M)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3 Coder Next or Gemini 3.6 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3 Coder Next and Gemini 3.6 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3 Coder Next cheaper than Gemini 3.6 Flash?
Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper: $0.290 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.120 vs $1.50. Output alone: $0.800 vs $7.50.
What context windows do Qwen3 Coder Next and Gemini 3.6 Flash have?
Qwen3 Coder Next: 262,144 tokens. Gemini 3.6 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3 Coder Next and Gemini 3.6 Flash?
Qwen3 Coder Next is made by Alibaba. Gemini 3.6 Flash is made by Google.
Related comparisons