token.app › Compare › Qwen3 Coder Next vs Inkling
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Inkling
Qwen3 Coder Next is 6.1× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Inkling accepts the larger context window (524K).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen3 Coder Next | Inkling | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | Thinkingmachines |
| Input $/1M | $0.120 | $1.00 |
| Output $/1M | $0.800 | $4.05 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.290 | $1.76 |
| Context window | 262K | 524K |
| Max output | 236K | 472K |
| Released | Feb 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Open weights |
Choose Qwen3 Coder Next if…
- Costs less per token — $0.290 vs $1.76 blended
Choose Inkling if…
- Larger context window (524K)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3 Coder Next or Inkling?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3 Coder Next and Inkling, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3 Coder Next cheaper than Inkling?
Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper: $0.290 versus $1.76 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.120 vs $1.00. Output alone: $0.800 vs $4.05.
What context windows do Qwen3 Coder Next and Inkling have?
Qwen3 Coder Next: 262,144 tokens. Inkling: 524,288 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3 Coder Next and Inkling?
Qwen3 Coder Next is made by Alibaba. Inkling is made by Thinkingmachines.
Related comparisons