token.app › Compare › Qwen3 Coder Next vs Muse Spark 1.2
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Muse Spark 1.2
Qwen3 Coder Next is 6.9× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Muse Spark 1.2 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen3 Coder Next | Muse Spark 1.2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | Meta |
| Input $/1M | $0.120 | $1.25 |
| Output $/1M | $0.800 | $4.25 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.290 | $2.00 |
| Context window | 262K | 1.0M |
| Max output | 262K | — |
| Released | Feb 2026 | Aug 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
Choose Qwen3 Coder Next if…
- Costs less per token — $0.290 vs $2.00 blended
- Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Muse Spark 1.2 if…
- Larger context window (1.0M)
- Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3 Coder Next or Muse Spark 1.2?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3 Coder Next and Muse Spark 1.2, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3 Coder Next cheaper than Muse Spark 1.2?
Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper: $0.290 versus $2.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.120 vs $1.25. Output alone: $0.800 vs $4.25.
What context windows do Qwen3 Coder Next and Muse Spark 1.2 have?
Qwen3 Coder Next: 262,144 tokens. Muse Spark 1.2: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3 Coder Next and Muse Spark 1.2?
Qwen3 Coder Next is made by Alibaba. Muse Spark 1.2 is made by Meta.
Related comparisons