token.app › Compare › Qwen3 Coder Next vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash is 5.3× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.7 Flash accepts the larger context window (1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen3 Coder Next | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | Alibaba |
| Input $/1M | $0.120 | $0.030 |
| Output $/1M | $0.800 | $0.130 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.290 | $0.055 |
| Context window | 262K | 1M |
| Max output | 262K | 66K |
| Released | Feb 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
Choose Qwen3 Coder Next if…
- Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
- Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $0.290 blended
- Larger context window (1M)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3 Coder Next or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3 Coder Next and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3 Coder Next cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $0.290 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.120 vs $0.030. Output alone: $0.800 vs $0.130.
What context windows do Qwen3 Coder Next and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
Qwen3 Coder Next: 262,144 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3 Coder Next and Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3 Coder Next is made by Alibaba. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.
Related comparisons