token.app › Compare › Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Beam 1.0 501B A23B is 1.1× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Beam 1.0 501B A23B accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B | Beam 1.0 501B A23B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | Reflection |
| Input $/1M | $0.300 | $0.250 |
| Output $/1M | $1.00 | $1.00 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.475 | $0.438 |
| Context window | 262K | 1.0M |
| Max output | 66K | 131K |
| Released | Jul 2025 | Oct 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Open weights |
Choose Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B if…
- No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Beam 1.0 501B A23B if…
- Costs less per token — $0.438 vs $0.475 blended
- Larger context window (1.0M)
- Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B and Beam 1.0 501B A23B, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B cheaper than Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Beam 1.0 501B A23B is cheaper: $0.438 versus $0.475 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.300 vs $0.250. Output alone: $1.00 vs $1.00.
What context windows do Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B and Beam 1.0 501B A23B have?
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B: 262,144 tokens. Beam 1.0 501B A23B: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B and Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B is made by Alibaba. Beam 1.0 501B A23B is made by Reflection.
Related comparisons
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B full details
Beam 1.0 501B A23B full details
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs Flint (free)
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free)
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs Glimpse
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free)
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs Mercury 3