token.app › Compare › Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 1.8× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35BDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
ProviderAlibabaDeepSeek
Input $/1M$0.300$0.150
Output $/1M$1.00$0.600
Blended $/1M$0.475$0.262
Context window262K1.0M
Max output66K393K
ReleasedJul 2025Oct 2026
LicenceOpen weightsOpen weights
Choose Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.262 vs $0.475 blended
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is cheaper: $0.262 versus $0.475 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.300 vs $0.150. Output alone: $1.00 vs $0.600.
What context windows do Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 have?
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B: 262,144 tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B is made by Alibaba. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is made by DeepSeek.
Related comparisons
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B full details DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 full details Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs Flint (free) Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs Glimpse Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs Mercury 3