token.app › Compare › Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs Mercury 3

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs Mercury 3

Mercury 3 is 2.9× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Mercury 3 accepts the larger context window (1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35BMercury 3
ProviderAlibabaInception
Input $/1M$0.300$0.100
Output $/1M$1.00$0.350
Blended $/1M$0.475$0.163
Context window262K1M
Max output66K131K
ReleasedJul 2025Oct 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B if…
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Mercury 3 if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.163 vs $0.475 blended
  • Larger context window (1M)
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B or Mercury 3?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B and Mercury 3, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B cheaper than Mercury 3?
Mercury 3 is cheaper: $0.163 versus $0.475 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.300 vs $0.100. Output alone: $1.00 vs $0.350.
What context windows do Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B and Mercury 3 have?
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B: 262,144 tokens. Mercury 3: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B and Mercury 3?
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B is made by Alibaba. Mercury 3 is made by Inception.
Related comparisons
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B full details Mercury 3 full details Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs Flint (free) Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs Glimpse Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B