token.app › Compare › Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B is 1.8× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35BGemini 3.5 Flash Lite
ProviderAlibabaGoogle
Input $/1M$0.300$0.300
Output $/1M$1.00$2.50
Blended $/1M$0.475$0.850
Context window262K1.0M
Max output66K66K
ReleasedJul 2025Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.475 vs $0.850 blended
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B or Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B cheaper than Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B is cheaper: $0.475 versus $0.850 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.300 vs $0.300. Output alone: $1.00 vs $2.50.
What context windows do Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite have?
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B: 262,144 tokens. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B is made by Alibaba. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is made by Google.
Related comparisons
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B full details Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite full details Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs Flint (free) Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs Glimpse Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B