token.app › Compare › Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs Inkling

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs Inkling

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B is 3.7× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Inkling accepts the larger context window (524K).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35BInkling
ProviderAlibabaThinkingmachines
Input $/1M$0.300$1.00
Output $/1M$1.00$4.05
Blended $/1M$0.475$1.76
Context window262K524K
Max output66K472K
ReleasedJul 2025Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsOpen weights
Choose Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.475 vs $1.76 blended
Choose Inkling if…
  • Larger context window (524K)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B or Inkling?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B and Inkling, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B cheaper than Inkling?
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B is cheaper: $0.475 versus $1.76 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.300 vs $1.00. Output alone: $1.00 vs $4.05.
What context windows do Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B and Inkling have?
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B: 262,144 tokens. Inkling: 524,288 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B and Inkling?
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B is made by Alibaba. Inkling is made by Thinkingmachines.
Related comparisons
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B full details Inkling full details Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs Flint (free) Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs Glimpse Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B