token.app › Compare › Qwen3.5-27B vs Claude Opus 5
Qwen3.5-27B vs Claude Opus 5
Qwen3.5-27B is 19× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Claude Opus 5 accepts the larger context window (1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen3.5-27B | Claude Opus 5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | Anthropic |
| Input $/1M | $0.195 | $5.00 |
| Output $/1M | $1.56 | $25.00 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.536 | $10.00 |
| Context window | 262K | 1M |
| Max output | 66K | 128K |
| Released | Feb 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
Choose Qwen3.5-27B if…
- Costs less per token — $0.536 vs $10.00 blended
- Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Claude Opus 5 if…
- Larger context window (1M)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.5-27B or Claude Opus 5?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3.5-27B and Claude Opus 5, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3.5-27B cheaper than Claude Opus 5?
Qwen3.5-27B is cheaper: $0.536 versus $10.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.195 vs $5.00. Output alone: $1.56 vs $25.00.
What context windows do Qwen3.5-27B and Claude Opus 5 have?
Qwen3.5-27B: 262,144 tokens. Claude Opus 5: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.5-27B and Claude Opus 5?
Qwen3.5-27B is made by Alibaba. Claude Opus 5 is made by Anthropic.