token.app › Compare › Qwen3.5-27B vs Muse Spark 1.2
Qwen3.5-27B vs Muse Spark 1.2
Qwen3.5-27B is 3.7× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Muse Spark 1.2 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen3.5-27B | Muse Spark 1.2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | Meta |
| Input $/1M | $0.195 | $1.25 |
| Output $/1M | $1.56 | $4.25 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.536 | $2.00 |
| Context window | 262K | 1.0M |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Released | Feb 2026 | Aug 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
Choose Qwen3.5-27B if…
- Costs less per token — $0.536 vs $2.00 blended
- Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Muse Spark 1.2 if…
- Larger context window (1.0M)
- Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.5-27B or Muse Spark 1.2?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3.5-27B and Muse Spark 1.2, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3.5-27B cheaper than Muse Spark 1.2?
Qwen3.5-27B is cheaper: $0.536 versus $2.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.195 vs $1.25. Output alone: $1.56 vs $4.25.
What context windows do Qwen3.5-27B and Muse Spark 1.2 have?
Qwen3.5-27B: 262,144 tokens. Muse Spark 1.2: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.5-27B and Muse Spark 1.2?
Qwen3.5-27B is made by Alibaba. Muse Spark 1.2 is made by Meta.