token.app › Compare › Qwen3.5-27B vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

Qwen3.5-27B vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is 4.8× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3.5-27BDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
ProviderAlibabaDeepSeek
Input $/1M$0.195$0.090
Output $/1M$1.56$0.180
Blended $/1M$0.536$0.113
Context window262K1.0M
Max output66K384K
ReleasedFeb 2026Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsOpen weights
Choose Qwen3.5-27B if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.113 vs $0.536 blended
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.5-27B or DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3.5-27B and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3.5-27B cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is cheaper: $0.113 versus $0.536 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.195 vs $0.090. Output alone: $1.56 vs $0.180.
What context windows do Qwen3.5-27B and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 have?
Qwen3.5-27B: 262,144 tokens. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.5-27B and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?
Qwen3.5-27B is made by Alibaba. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is made by DeepSeek.
Related comparisons