token.app › Compare › Qwen3.5-27B vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.5-27B vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash is 9.8× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.7 Flash accepts the larger context window (1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen3.5-27B | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | Alibaba |
| Input $/1M | $0.195 | $0.030 |
| Output $/1M | $1.56 | $0.130 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.536 | $0.055 |
| Context window | 262K | 1M |
| Max output | 66K | 66K |
| Released | Feb 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
Choose Qwen3.5-27B if…
- Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
- Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $0.536 blended
- Larger context window (1M)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.5-27B or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3.5-27B and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3.5-27B cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $0.536 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.195 vs $0.030. Output alone: $1.56 vs $0.130.
What context windows do Qwen3.5-27B and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
Qwen3.5-27B: 262,144 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.5-27B and Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.5-27B is made by Alibaba. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.