token.app › Compare › Qwen3.5-27B vs Grok 4.5
Qwen3.5-27B vs Grok 4.5
Qwen3.5-27B is 5.6× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Grok 4.5 accepts the larger context window (500K).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen3.5-27B | Grok 4.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | xAI |
| Input $/1M | $0.195 | $2.00 |
| Output $/1M | $1.56 | $6.00 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.536 | $3.00 |
| Context window | 262K | 500K |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Released | Feb 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
Choose Qwen3.5-27B if…
- Costs less per token — $0.536 vs $3.00 blended
- Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Grok 4.5 if…
- Larger context window (500K)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.5-27B or Grok 4.5?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3.5-27B and Grok 4.5, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3.5-27B cheaper than Grok 4.5?
Qwen3.5-27B is cheaper: $0.536 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.195 vs $2.00. Output alone: $1.56 vs $6.00.
What context windows do Qwen3.5-27B and Grok 4.5 have?
Qwen3.5-27B: 262,144 tokens. Grok 4.5: 500,000 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.5-27B and Grok 4.5?
Qwen3.5-27B is made by Alibaba. Grok 4.5 is made by xAI.