token.app › Compare › Qwen3.5-27B vs Kimi K3
Qwen3.5-27B vs Kimi K3
Qwen3.5-27B is 11× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Kimi K3 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen3.5-27B | Kimi K3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | Moonshot AI |
| Input $/1M | $0.195 | $3.00 |
| Output $/1M | $1.56 | $15.00 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.536 | $6.00 |
| Context window | 262K | 1.0M |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Released | Feb 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Open weights |
Choose Qwen3.5-27B if…
- Costs less per token — $0.536 vs $6.00 blended
Choose Kimi K3 if…
- Larger context window (1.0M)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.5-27B or Kimi K3?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3.5-27B and Kimi K3, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3.5-27B cheaper than Kimi K3?
Qwen3.5-27B is cheaper: $0.536 versus $6.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.195 vs $3.00. Output alone: $1.56 vs $15.00.
What context windows do Qwen3.5-27B and Kimi K3 have?
Qwen3.5-27B: 262,144 tokens. Kimi K3: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.5-27B and Kimi K3?
Qwen3.5-27B is made by Alibaba. Kimi K3 is made by Moonshot AI.