token.app › Compare › Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest

Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest

DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest is 7.8× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3.5 397B A17BDeepSeek V4 Flash Latest
ProviderAlibaba~deepseek
Input $/1M$0.390$0.090
Output $/1M$2.34$0.180
Blended $/1M$0.877$0.113
Context window262K1.0M
Max output66K384K
ReleasedFeb 2026Aug 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Qwen3.5 397B A17B if…
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.113 vs $0.877 blended
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.5 397B A17B or DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3.5 397B A17B and DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3.5 397B A17B cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest?
DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest is cheaper: $0.113 versus $0.877 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.390 vs $0.090. Output alone: $2.34 vs $0.180.
What context windows do Qwen3.5 397B A17B and DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest have?
Qwen3.5 397B A17B: 262,144 tokens. DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.5 397B A17B and DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest?
Qwen3.5 397B A17B is made by Alibaba. DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest is made by ~deepseek.
Related comparisons