token.app › Compare › Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash is 16× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.7 Flash accepts the larger context window (1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen3.5 397B A17B | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | Alibaba |
| Input $/1M | $0.390 | $0.030 |
| Output $/1M | $2.34 | $0.130 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.877 | $0.055 |
| Context window | 262K | 1M |
| Max output | 66K | 66K |
| Released | Feb 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
Choose Qwen3.5 397B A17B if…
- Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
- Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $0.877 blended
- Larger context window (1M)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.5 397B A17B or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3.5 397B A17B cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $0.877 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.390 vs $0.030. Output alone: $2.34 vs $0.130.
What context windows do Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
Qwen3.5 397B A17B: 262,144 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.5 397B A17B is made by Alibaba. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.
Related comparisons