token.app › Compare › Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Grok 4.5
Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Grok 4.5
Qwen3.5 397B A17B is 3.4× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Grok 4.5 accepts the larger context window (500K).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen3.5 397B A17B | Grok 4.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | xAI |
| Input $/1M | $0.390 | $2.00 |
| Output $/1M | $2.34 | $6.00 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.877 | $3.00 |
| Context window | 262K | 500K |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Released | Feb 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
Choose Qwen3.5 397B A17B if…
- Costs less per token — $0.877 vs $3.00 blended
- Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Grok 4.5 if…
- Larger context window (500K)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.5 397B A17B or Grok 4.5?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Grok 4.5, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3.5 397B A17B cheaper than Grok 4.5?
Qwen3.5 397B A17B is cheaper: $0.877 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.390 vs $2.00. Output alone: $2.34 vs $6.00.
What context windows do Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Grok 4.5 have?
Qwen3.5 397B A17B: 262,144 tokens. Grok 4.5: 500,000 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Grok 4.5?
Qwen3.5 397B A17B is made by Alibaba. Grok 4.5 is made by xAI.
Related comparisons