token.app › Compare › Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Kimi K3
Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Kimi K3
Qwen3.5 397B A17B is 6.8× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Kimi K3 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen3.5 397B A17B | Kimi K3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | Moonshot AI |
| Input $/1M | $0.390 | $3.00 |
| Output $/1M | $2.34 | $15.00 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.877 | $6.00 |
| Context window | 262K | 1.0M |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Released | Feb 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Open weights |
Choose Qwen3.5 397B A17B if…
- Costs less per token — $0.877 vs $6.00 blended
Choose Kimi K3 if…
- Larger context window (1.0M)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.5 397B A17B or Kimi K3?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Kimi K3, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3.5 397B A17B cheaper than Kimi K3?
Qwen3.5 397B A17B is cheaper: $0.877 versus $6.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.390 vs $3.00. Output alone: $2.34 vs $15.00.
What context windows do Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Kimi K3 have?
Qwen3.5 397B A17B: 262,144 tokens. Kimi K3: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Kimi K3?
Qwen3.5 397B A17B is made by Alibaba. Kimi K3 is made by Moonshot AI.
Related comparisons