token.app › Compare › Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs Gemini 3.7 Flash
Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs Gemini 3.7 Flash
Gemini 3.7 Flash leads on 3 of 3 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.6 35B A3B is 4.8× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Gemini 3.7 Flash accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen3.6 35B A3B | Gemini 3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | |
| Input $/1M | $0.100 | $0.750 |
| Output $/1M | $0.950 | $3.75 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.313 | $1.50 |
| Context window | 262K | 1.0M |
| Max output | 236K | 66K |
| Released | Apr 2026 | Aug 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
| GPQA Diamond | 84.8% | 94.8% |
| FrontierMath T1–3 | 20.4% | 71.6% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 86.7% | 97.2% |
Benchmark scores independently run and published by Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub', used under CC BY 4.0. Only benchmarks with a score for BOTH models are compared.
Choose Qwen3.6 35B A3B if…
- Costs less per token — $0.313 vs $1.50 blended
- Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Gemini 3.7 Flash if…
- Higher GPQA Diamond (94.8% vs 84.8%)
- Higher FrontierMath T1–3 (71.6% vs 20.4%)
- Higher OTIS Mock AIME (97.2% vs 86.7%)
- Larger context window (1.0M)
- Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.6 35B A3B or Gemini 3.7 Flash?
Across the 3 benchmarks both models have independently-run scores for, Qwen3.6 35B A3B leads on 0 and Gemini 3.7 Flash leads on 3. Benchmarks are one input — price and context window are on this page too.
Is Qwen3.6 35B A3B cheaper than Gemini 3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.6 35B A3B is cheaper: $0.313 versus $1.50 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.100 vs $0.750. Output alone: $0.950 vs $3.75.
What context windows do Qwen3.6 35B A3B and Gemini 3.7 Flash have?
Qwen3.6 35B A3B: 262,144 tokens. Gemini 3.7 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.6 35B A3B and Gemini 3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.6 35B A3B is made by Alibaba. Gemini 3.7 Flash is made by Google.
Related comparisons