token.app › Compare › Qwen3.7 Plus (batch) vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Qwen3.7 Plus (batch) vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Qwen3.7 Plus (batch) is 1.1× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Beam 1.0 501B A23B accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3.7 Plus (batch)Beam 1.0 501B A23B
ProviderAlibabaReflection
Input $/1M$0.230$0.250
Output $/1M$0.920$1.00
Blended $/1M$0.403$0.438
Context window262K1.0M
Max output131K131K
ReleasedJun 2026Oct 2026
LicenceProprietaryOpen weights
Choose Qwen3.7 Plus (batch) if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.403 vs $0.438 blended
Choose Beam 1.0 501B A23B if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Open weights — self-hostable
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.7 Plus (batch) or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3.7 Plus (batch) and Beam 1.0 501B A23B, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3.7 Plus (batch) cheaper than Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Qwen3.7 Plus (batch) is cheaper: $0.403 versus $0.438 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.230 vs $0.250. Output alone: $0.920 vs $1.00.
What context windows do Qwen3.7 Plus (batch) and Beam 1.0 501B A23B have?
Qwen3.7 Plus (batch): 262,144 tokens. Beam 1.0 501B A23B: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.7 Plus (batch) and Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Qwen3.7 Plus (batch) is made by Alibaba. Beam 1.0 501B A23B is made by Reflection.
Related comparisons
Qwen3.7 Plus (batch) full details Beam 1.0 501B A23B full details Qwen3.7 Plus (batch) vs Flint (free) Qwen3.7 Plus (batch) vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Qwen3.7 Plus (batch) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Qwen3.7 Plus (batch) vs Glimpse Qwen3.7 Plus (batch) vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Qwen3.7 Plus (batch) vs Mercury 3