token.app › Compare › Qwen3.7 Plus (batch) vs Mercury 3

Qwen3.7 Plus (batch) vs Mercury 3

Mercury 3 is 2.5× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Mercury 3 accepts the larger context window (1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3.7 Plus (batch)Mercury 3
ProviderAlibabaInception
Input $/1M$0.230$0.100
Output $/1M$0.920$0.350
Blended $/1M$0.403$0.163
Context window262K1M
Max output131K131K
ReleasedJun 2026Oct 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Choose Qwen3.7 Plus (batch) if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Mercury 3 if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.163 vs $0.403 blended
  • Larger context window (1M)
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.7 Plus (batch) or Mercury 3?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3.7 Plus (batch) and Mercury 3, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3.7 Plus (batch) cheaper than Mercury 3?
Mercury 3 is cheaper: $0.163 versus $0.403 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.230 vs $0.100. Output alone: $0.920 vs $0.350.
What context windows do Qwen3.7 Plus (batch) and Mercury 3 have?
Qwen3.7 Plus (batch): 262,144 tokens. Mercury 3: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.7 Plus (batch) and Mercury 3?
Qwen3.7 Plus (batch) is made by Alibaba. Mercury 3 is made by Inception.
Related comparisons
Qwen3.7 Plus (batch) full details Mercury 3 full details Qwen3.7 Plus (batch) vs Flint (free) Qwen3.7 Plus (batch) vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Qwen3.7 Plus (batch) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Qwen3.7 Plus (batch) vs Glimpse Qwen3.7 Plus (batch) vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Qwen3.7 Plus (batch) vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B