token.app › Compare › Qwen3.7 Plus (batch) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Qwen3.7 Plus (batch) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 1.5× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3.7 Plus (batch)DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
ProviderAlibabaDeepSeek
Input $/1M$0.230$0.150
Output $/1M$0.920$0.600
Blended $/1M$0.403$0.262
Context window262K1.0M
Max output131K393K
ReleasedJun 2026Oct 2026
LicenceProprietaryOpen weights
Choose Qwen3.7 Plus (batch) if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.262 vs $0.403 blended
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Open weights — self-hostable
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.7 Plus (batch) or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3.7 Plus (batch) and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3.7 Plus (batch) cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is cheaper: $0.262 versus $0.403 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.230 vs $0.150. Output alone: $0.920 vs $0.600.
What context windows do Qwen3.7 Plus (batch) and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 have?
Qwen3.7 Plus (batch): 262,144 tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.7 Plus (batch) and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Qwen3.7 Plus (batch) is made by Alibaba. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is made by DeepSeek.
Related comparisons
Qwen3.7 Plus (batch) full details DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 full details Qwen3.7 Plus (batch) vs Flint (free) Qwen3.7 Plus (batch) vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Qwen3.7 Plus (batch) vs Glimpse Qwen3.7 Plus (batch) vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Qwen3.7 Plus (batch) vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B Qwen3.7 Plus (batch) vs Mercury 3