token.app › Compare › Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Beam 1.0 501B A23B is 6.9× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis.
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | Beam 1.0 501B A23B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | Reflection |
| Input $/1M | $2.00 | $0.250 |
| Output $/1M | $6.00 | $1.00 |
| Blended $/1M | $3.00 | $0.438 |
| Context window | 1.0M | 1.0M |
| Max output | 909K | 131K |
| Released | Aug 2026 | Oct 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Open weights |
Choose Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B if…
- No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Beam 1.0 501B A23B if…
- Costs less per token — $0.438 vs $3.00 blended
- Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and Beam 1.0 501B A23B, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B cheaper than Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Beam 1.0 501B A23B is cheaper: $0.438 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $2.00 vs $0.250. Output alone: $6.00 vs $1.00.
What context windows do Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and Beam 1.0 501B A23B have?
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: 1,048,576 tokens. Beam 1.0 501B A23B: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is made by Alibaba. Beam 1.0 501B A23B is made by Reflection.
Related comparisons