token.app › Compare › Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 11× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis.
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | DeepSeek |
| Input $/1M | $2.00 | $0.150 |
| Output $/1M | $6.00 | $0.600 |
| Blended $/1M | $3.00 | $0.262 |
| Context window | 1.0M | 1.0M |
| Max output | 909K | 393K |
| Released | Aug 2026 | Oct 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Open weights |
Choose Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B if…
- No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 if…
- Costs less per token — $0.262 vs $3.00 blended
- Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is cheaper: $0.262 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $2.00 vs $0.150. Output alone: $6.00 vs $0.600.
What context windows do Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 have?
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: 1,048,576 tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is made by Alibaba. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is made by DeepSeek.
Related comparisons