token.app › Compare › Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Glimpse
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Glimpse
Glimpse is 2.5× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | Glimpse | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | Elorian |
| Input $/1M | $2.00 | $0.600 |
| Output $/1M | $6.00 | $3.00 |
| Blended $/1M | $3.00 | $1.20 |
| Context window | 1.0M | 262K |
| Max output | 909K | 256K |
| Released | Aug 2026 | Oct 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
Choose Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B if…
- Larger context window (1.0M)
- Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Glimpse if…
- Costs less per token — $1.20 vs $3.00 blended
- Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B or Glimpse?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and Glimpse, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B cheaper than Glimpse?
Glimpse is cheaper: $1.20 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $2.00 vs $0.600. Output alone: $6.00 vs $3.00.
What context windows do Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and Glimpse have?
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: 1,048,576 tokens. Glimpse: 262,144 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and Glimpse?
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is made by Alibaba. Glimpse is made by Elorian.
Related comparisons