token.app › Compare › Qwen3.8 27B vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Qwen3.8 27B vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Qwen3.8 27B is 1.2× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Beam 1.0 501B A23B accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen3.8 27B | Beam 1.0 501B A23B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | Reflection |
| Input $/1M | $0.040 | $0.250 |
| Output $/1M | $1.35 | $1.00 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.368 | $0.438 |
| Context window | 1M | 1.0M |
| Max output | 66K | 131K |
| Released | Aug 2026 | Oct 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Open weights |
Choose Qwen3.8 27B if…
- Costs less per token — $0.368 vs $0.438 blended
Choose Beam 1.0 501B A23B if…
- Larger context window (1.0M)
- Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.8 27B or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3.8 27B and Beam 1.0 501B A23B, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3.8 27B cheaper than Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Qwen3.8 27B is cheaper: $0.368 versus $0.438 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.040 vs $0.250. Output alone: $1.35 vs $1.00.
What context windows do Qwen3.8 27B and Beam 1.0 501B A23B have?
Qwen3.8 27B: 1,000,000 tokens. Beam 1.0 501B A23B: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.8 27B and Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Qwen3.8 27B is made by Alibaba. Beam 1.0 501B A23B is made by Reflection.