token.app › Compare › Qwen3.8 27B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Qwen3.8 27B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 1.4× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen3.8 27B | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | DeepSeek |
| Input $/1M | $0.040 | $0.150 |
| Output $/1M | $1.35 | $0.600 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.368 | $0.262 |
| Context window | 1M | 1.0M |
| Max output | 66K | 393K |
| Released | Aug 2026 | Oct 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Open weights |
Choose Qwen3.8 27B if…
- No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 if…
- Costs less per token — $0.262 vs $0.368 blended
- Larger context window (1.0M)
- Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.8 27B or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3.8 27B and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3.8 27B cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is cheaper: $0.262 versus $0.368 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.040 vs $0.150. Output alone: $1.35 vs $0.600.
What context windows do Qwen3.8 27B and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 have?
Qwen3.8 27B: 1,000,000 tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.8 27B and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Qwen3.8 27B is made by Alibaba. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is made by DeepSeek.