token.app › Compare › Qwen3.8 27B vs Mercury 3
Qwen3.8 27B vs Mercury 3
Mercury 3 is 2.3× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis.
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen3.8 27B | Mercury 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | Inception |
| Input $/1M | $0.040 | $0.100 |
| Output $/1M | $1.35 | $0.350 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.368 | $0.163 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 66K | 131K |
| Released | Aug 2026 | Oct 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
Choose Qwen3.8 27B if…
- Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Mercury 3 if…
- Costs less per token — $0.163 vs $0.368 blended
- Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.8 27B or Mercury 3?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3.8 27B and Mercury 3, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3.8 27B cheaper than Mercury 3?
Mercury 3 is cheaper: $0.163 versus $0.368 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.040 vs $0.100. Output alone: $1.35 vs $0.350.
What context windows do Qwen3.8 27B and Mercury 3 have?
Qwen3.8 27B: 1,000,000 tokens. Mercury 3: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.8 27B and Mercury 3?
Qwen3.8 27B is made by Alibaba. Mercury 3 is made by Inception.