token.app › Compare › Qwen3.8 27B vs Claude Opus 5
Qwen3.8 27B vs Claude Opus 5
Qwen3.8 27B is 27× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis.
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen3.8 27B | Claude Opus 5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | Anthropic |
| Input $/1M | $0.040 | $5.00 |
| Output $/1M | $1.35 | $25.00 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.368 | $10.00 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 66K | 128K |
| Released | Aug 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
Choose Qwen3.8 27B if…
- Costs less per token — $0.368 vs $10.00 blended
- Open weights — self-hostable
- Newer model (released Aug 2026)
Choose Claude Opus 5 if…
- No clear advantage on the data we hold.
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.8 27B or Claude Opus 5?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3.8 27B and Claude Opus 5, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3.8 27B cheaper than Claude Opus 5?
Qwen3.8 27B is cheaper: $0.368 versus $10.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.040 vs $5.00. Output alone: $1.35 vs $25.00.
What context windows do Qwen3.8 27B and Claude Opus 5 have?
Qwen3.8 27B: 1,000,000 tokens. Claude Opus 5: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.8 27B and Claude Opus 5?
Qwen3.8 27B is made by Alibaba. Claude Opus 5 is made by Anthropic.