token.app › Compare › Qwen3.8 27B vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
Qwen3.8 27B vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
Qwen3.8 27B is 1.8× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen3.8 27B | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | DeepSeek |
| Input $/1M | $0.040 | $0.440 |
| Output $/1M | $1.35 | $1.32 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.368 | $0.660 |
| Context window | 1M | 1.0M |
| Max output | 66K | 131K |
| Released | Aug 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Open weights |
Choose Qwen3.8 27B if…
- Costs less per token — $0.368 vs $0.660 blended
- Newer model (released Aug 2026)
Choose DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 if…
- Larger context window (1.0M)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.8 27B or DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3.8 27B and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3.8 27B cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?
Qwen3.8 27B is cheaper: $0.368 versus $0.660 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.040 vs $0.440. Output alone: $1.35 vs $1.32.
What context windows do Qwen3.8 27B and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 have?
Qwen3.8 27B: 1,000,000 tokens. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.8 27B and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?
Qwen3.8 27B is made by Alibaba. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is made by DeepSeek.