token.app › Compare › Qwen3.8 27B vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Qwen3.8 27B vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Qwen3.8 27B is 2.3× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen3.8 27B | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | |
| Input $/1M | $0.040 | $0.300 |
| Output $/1M | $1.35 | $2.50 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.368 | $0.850 |
| Context window | 1M | 1.0M |
| Max output | 66K | 66K |
| Released | Aug 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
Choose Qwen3.8 27B if…
- Costs less per token — $0.368 vs $0.850 blended
- Open weights — self-hostable
- Newer model (released Aug 2026)
Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite if…
- Larger context window (1.0M)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.8 27B or Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3.8 27B and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3.8 27B cheaper than Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
Qwen3.8 27B is cheaper: $0.368 versus $0.850 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.040 vs $0.300. Output alone: $1.35 vs $2.50.
What context windows do Qwen3.8 27B and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite have?
Qwen3.8 27B: 1,000,000 tokens. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.8 27B and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
Qwen3.8 27B is made by Alibaba. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is made by Google.