token.app › Compare › Qwen3.8 27B vs Gemini 3.6 Flash
Qwen3.8 27B vs Gemini 3.6 Flash
Qwen3.8 27B is 4.1× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Gemini 3.6 Flash accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen3.8 27B | Gemini 3.6 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | |
| Input $/1M | $0.040 | $0.750 |
| Output $/1M | $1.35 | $3.75 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.368 | $1.50 |
| Context window | 1M | 1.0M |
| Max output | 66K | 66K |
| Released | Aug 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
Choose Qwen3.8 27B if…
- Costs less per token — $0.368 vs $1.50 blended
- Open weights — self-hostable
- Newer model (released Aug 2026)
Choose Gemini 3.6 Flash if…
- Larger context window (1.0M)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.8 27B or Gemini 3.6 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3.8 27B and Gemini 3.6 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3.8 27B cheaper than Gemini 3.6 Flash?
Qwen3.8 27B is cheaper: $0.368 versus $1.50 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.040 vs $0.750. Output alone: $1.35 vs $3.75.
What context windows do Qwen3.8 27B and Gemini 3.6 Flash have?
Qwen3.8 27B: 1,000,000 tokens. Gemini 3.6 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.8 27B and Gemini 3.6 Flash?
Qwen3.8 27B is made by Alibaba. Gemini 3.6 Flash is made by Google.