token.app › Compare › Qwen3.8 27B vs Grok 4.6
Qwen3.8 27B vs Grok 4.6
Qwen3.8 27B is 8.2× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.8 27B accepts the larger context window (1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen3.8 27B | Grok 4.6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | SpaceXAI |
| Input $/1M | $0.040 | $2.00 |
| Output $/1M | $1.35 | $6.00 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.368 | $3.00 |
| Context window | 1M | 500K |
| Max output | 66K | 450K |
| Released | Aug 2026 | Aug 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
Choose Qwen3.8 27B if…
- Costs less per token — $0.368 vs $3.00 blended
- Larger context window (1M)
- Open weights — self-hostable
- Newer model (released Aug 2026)
Choose Grok 4.6 if…
- No clear advantage on the data we hold.
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.8 27B or Grok 4.6?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3.8 27B and Grok 4.6, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3.8 27B cheaper than Grok 4.6?
Qwen3.8 27B is cheaper: $0.368 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.040 vs $2.00. Output alone: $1.35 vs $6.00.
What context windows do Qwen3.8 27B and Grok 4.6 have?
Qwen3.8 27B: 1,000,000 tokens. Grok 4.6: 500,000 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.8 27B and Grok 4.6?
Qwen3.8 27B is made by Alibaba. Grok 4.6 is made by SpaceXAI.