token.app › Compare › Qwen3.8 27B vs Inkling
Qwen3.8 27B vs Inkling
Qwen3.8 27B is 4.8× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.8 27B accepts the larger context window (1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen3.8 27B | Inkling | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | Thinkingmachines |
| Input $/1M | $0.040 | $1.00 |
| Output $/1M | $1.35 | $4.05 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.368 | $1.76 |
| Context window | 1M | 524K |
| Max output | 66K | 472K |
| Released | Aug 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Open weights |
Choose Qwen3.8 27B if…
- Costs less per token — $0.368 vs $1.76 blended
- Larger context window (1M)
- Newer model (released Aug 2026)
Choose Inkling if…
- No clear advantage on the data we hold.
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.8 27B or Inkling?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3.8 27B and Inkling, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3.8 27B cheaper than Inkling?
Qwen3.8 27B is cheaper: $0.368 versus $1.76 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.040 vs $1.00. Output alone: $1.35 vs $4.05.
What context windows do Qwen3.8 27B and Inkling have?
Qwen3.8 27B: 1,000,000 tokens. Inkling: 524,288 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.8 27B and Inkling?
Qwen3.8 27B is made by Alibaba. Inkling is made by Thinkingmachines.