token.app › Compare › Qwen3.8 27B vs Inkling Small
Qwen3.8 27B vs Inkling Small
Qwen3.8 27B is 1.7× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.8 27B accepts the larger context window (1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen3.8 27B | Inkling Small | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | Thinkingmachines |
| Input $/1M | $0.040 | $0.450 |
| Output $/1M | $1.35 | $1.20 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.368 | $0.637 |
| Context window | 1M | 524K |
| Max output | 66K | 262K |
| Released | Aug 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Open weights |
Choose Qwen3.8 27B if…
- Costs less per token — $0.368 vs $0.637 blended
- Larger context window (1M)
- Newer model (released Aug 2026)
Choose Inkling Small if…
- No clear advantage on the data we hold.
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.8 27B or Inkling Small?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3.8 27B and Inkling Small, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3.8 27B cheaper than Inkling Small?
Qwen3.8 27B is cheaper: $0.368 versus $0.637 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.040 vs $0.450. Output alone: $1.35 vs $1.20.
What context windows do Qwen3.8 27B and Inkling Small have?
Qwen3.8 27B: 1,000,000 tokens. Inkling Small: 524,288 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.8 27B and Inkling Small?
Qwen3.8 27B is made by Alibaba. Inkling Small is made by Thinkingmachines.