token.app โ€บ Compare โ€บ R1 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash

R1 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash

Gemini 3.6 Flash leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks. R1 is 2.6ร— cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Gemini 3.6 Flash accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
R1Gemini 3.6 Flash
ProviderDeepSeekGoogle
Input $/1M$0.700$1.50
Output $/1M$2.50$7.50
Blended $/1M$1.15$3.00
Context window164K1.0M
Max output16K66K
ReleasedJan 2025Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
GPQA Diamond 71.7% 94.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 53.3% 94.2%
Benchmark scores independently run and published by Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub', used under CC BY 4.0. Only benchmarks with a score for BOTH models are compared.
Choose R1 ifโ€ฆ
  • Costs less per token โ€” $1.15 vs $3.00 blended
  • Open weights โ€” self-hostable
Choose Gemini 3.6 Flash ifโ€ฆ
  • Higher GPQA Diamond (94.1% vs 71.7%)
  • Higher OTIS Mock AIME (94.2% vs 53.3%)
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, R1 or Gemini 3.6 Flash?
Across the 2 benchmarks both models have independently-run scores for, R1 leads on 0 and Gemini 3.6 Flash leads on 2. Benchmarks are one input โ€” price and context window are on this page too.
Is R1 cheaper than Gemini 3.6 Flash?
R1 is cheaper: $1.15 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.700 vs $1.50. Output alone: $2.50 vs $7.50.
What context windows do R1 and Gemini 3.6 Flash have?
R1: 163,840 tokens. Gemini 3.6 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes R1 and Gemini 3.6 Flash?
R1 is made by DeepSeek. Gemini 3.6 Flash is made by Google.
Related comparisons