token.app › Compare › R1 vs Inkling Small
R1 vs Inkling Small
Inkling Small is 1.8× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Inkling Small accepts the larger context window (524K).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| R1 | Inkling Small | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Thinkingmachines |
| Input $/1M | $0.700 | $0.450 |
| Output $/1M | $2.50 | $1.20 |
| Blended $/1M | $1.15 | $0.637 |
| Context window | 164K | 524K |
| Max output | 16K | 262K |
| Released | Jan 2025 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Open weights |
Choose R1 if…
- No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Inkling Small if…
- Costs less per token — $0.637 vs $1.15 blended
- Larger context window (524K)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, R1 or Inkling Small?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both R1 and Inkling Small, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is R1 cheaper than Inkling Small?
Inkling Small is cheaper: $0.637 versus $1.15 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.700 vs $0.450. Output alone: $2.50 vs $1.20.
What context windows do R1 and Inkling Small have?
R1: 163,840 tokens. Inkling Small: 524,288 tokens.
Who makes R1 and Inkling Small?
R1 is made by DeepSeek. Inkling Small is made by Thinkingmachines.