token.app › Compare › R1 vs Qwen3.8 Max
R1 vs Qwen3.8 Max
Qwen3.8 Max leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks. R1 is 2.6× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.8 Max accepts the larger context window (1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| R1 | Qwen3.8 Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Alibaba |
| Input $/1M | $0.700 | $2.00 |
| Output $/1M | $2.50 | $6.00 |
| Blended $/1M | $1.15 | $3.00 |
| Context window | 164K | 1M |
| Max output | 16K | 131K |
| Released | Jan 2025 | Aug 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
| GPQA Diamond | 71.7% | 92.7% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 53.3% | 99.4% |
Benchmark scores independently run and published by Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub', used under CC BY 4.0. Only benchmarks with a score for BOTH models are compared.
Choose R1 if…
- Costs less per token — $1.15 vs $3.00 blended
- Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Qwen3.8 Max if…
- Higher GPQA Diamond (92.7% vs 71.7%)
- Higher OTIS Mock AIME (99.4% vs 53.3%)
- Larger context window (1M)
- Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, R1 or Qwen3.8 Max?
Across the 2 benchmarks both models have independently-run scores for, R1 leads on 0 and Qwen3.8 Max leads on 2. Benchmarks are one input — price and context window are on this page too.
Is R1 cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max?
R1 is cheaper: $1.15 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.700 vs $2.00. Output alone: $2.50 vs $6.00.
What context windows do R1 and Qwen3.8 Max have?
R1: 163,840 tokens. Qwen3.8 Max: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes R1 and Qwen3.8 Max?
R1 is made by DeepSeek. Qwen3.8 Max is made by Alibaba.